reachpaster.blogg.se

1. LINUX ON A MAC CUBE DRIVERS
2. LINUX ON A MAC CUBE FULL
3. LINUX ON A MAC CUBE SOFTWARE
4. LINUX ON A MAC CUBE WINDOWS

This puts it in an awkward spot: certain developers are begging users to switch to Wayland despite the fact that it only works with two and a half DEs, while other developers are pledging to never transition their software in the first place.

LINUX ON A MAC CUBE WINDOWS

On top of that, it doesn't have feature parity with the window server on Windows and certainly doesn't approach the capability of Quartz (and likely never will, judging by it's core values). It's become it's own thing entirely, with it's own goals and conflicts with the xorg ideology. The issue is that Wayland isn't a replacement for X. We jumped from Jack, OSS and Alsa to PulseAudio and now to PipeWire and things look promising, but PipeWire is also in the progress, so we're not entirely there yet either.īottom line is: There can't be a distro that "just works", because we're missing the pieces to assemble such a distro. It will get there, eventually, at which point it might be able to offer the "it just works" experience. it has been "in progress" for +10 years and it's still not "there".

Mir never really took off (because of community backlash?), while Wayland is. Mir and Wayland were born precisely to fix this entire mess. And because of all the design limitations, X just can't compete with either Windows nor MacOS (in that specific environment setup that you're asking for).

It runs on a graphical server that was designed way before GPUs were even a thing (let alone multi-GPU, variable refresh rate monitors, HDPi, HDR, etc.). Linux, as in "in the desktop environment", has a HUGE (a can't highlight and stress enough the word HUGE) technical debt. It really depends on what exactly you're looking for in the "it just works" experience, but since you mention "screen recording" and "external devices" I'll assume that you're specifically asking about the modern gamer-streamer (w/ mic, hardware-based sound control, multiple inputs, ViV, etc.) setup and not a basic-browser-and-mail setup. It's generally quite clear what the tradeoffs are when you're comparing between any give pair of devices in their lineup. Meanwhile, Apple's product lines aren't quite as simple as they once were, but they're still very straightforward. They have (or, as I said, had) multiple different named lines within each product category, and several models within each line, and then each model has different possible configurations.Īnd unless you're the kind of person who has already studied the components enough to be able to build your own computer, you're not going to be able to easily tell, "Which of these actually has the most of the things I am looking for?" Second of all, have you actually compared the selection of hardware between Apple and any of these brands? I'll admit it's been a little while since I tried to give someone recommendations on a Windows machine, but the selection is just dizzying, and not in a helpful "here are all the different possible variables you could configure, and here are the possible values for them" way. So while there surely is a lot to criticize about Ubuntu from a poweruser's perspective (like the snap stuff), I must say that I was pleasantly surprised how much better the experience has become over the years.įirst of all, they are by definition not vertically integrated, because the same company doesn't create the hardware and the OS.

LINUX ON A MAC CUBE DRIVERS

Installing the NVidia drivers instead of Noveau is trivial, even Dell firmware updates for the docking station can be directly installed from the Ubuntu software center. Even notoriously problematic stuff like fractional scaling on external monitors really worked well. With a bit of fiddling you'll even get features that are unavailable on Windows (like proper S3 sleep instead of "modern standby", which is driving me absolutely bonkers). It's not perfect, but neither is Windows.

LINUX ON A MAC CUBE FULL

I recently installed Ubuntu on a certified Dell Precision and was impressed how smooth that went, even with stuff like full disc encryption, secure boot, docking station support, NVidia Optimus, etc. If you carefully select it, you won't have much issues at all with a distribution like Ubuntu, which actually lists "certified" hardware here: As many are already saying, it pretty much depends on hardware.